Under Pressure
This has been a
week for TPMS issues—that’s AutoGeek for Tire Pressure Monitoring System. Many
failures were attributed to the fact that the sensor batteries are getting
older with each passing year. Battery life is directly related to the number of
radio frequency transmissions which are affected by the system/sensor design
and driving habits. Generally speaking, short drive trips with starts and stops
can have a greater impact than overall miles driven. Those sensors have been
rated at a 7-to-10-year life span but again, there are many conditions affecting
battery life.
“What we’ve been
fighting is a 2010 Ford Focus with a B2872 and a B287A code. What do you think
it could be?” They ask.
Like I memorize
every single DTC out there, right? Doesn’t everybody? So, I ask, “What are the
code definitions?”
“The B2872 is a
tire pressure sensor fault in general if the GEM module loses a sensor signal
and B287A sets when the GEM module doesn’t get a response from all four
sensors.”
“Okay,” I said. “Did
you do anything to diagnose it?”
“We performed the
relearn procedure and the car seemed fine after we road tested it. It came back
three weeks later.”
“Okay,” I said,
writing that down. I always jot down the notes and then review them for later.
“Anything else?”
“We did a cold
reboot of the smart junction box,” was the response.
“How did you do
that?”
“We pulled the
battery cables off and shorted them together for about a minute to drain the
SJB’s memory.”
I jotted that down
in my notepad. “Anything else?”
“The car has a
dealer-installed car alarm but that was two years ago and this problem is
fairly recent.”
I wrote that down.
“How long do the
batteries last in the sensors?”
“That depends on driving
habits for the most part. Manufacturers claim 7-10 years but I’ve been hearing
that they last at the lower end of the window in city driving.”
“We replaced all
the sensors on the vehicle but the car came back for the same problem and the
same two codes.”
“At least you know
what isn’t causing the problem,” I said.
They didn’t
appreciate my comment. No one ever does. I remember a
customer asked a friend of mine, “If a shop doesn’t send their technicians to
training classes, then where do those technicians get their training from?” The
response was, “Your wallet.”
“Do you think the
Smart Junction Box could be bad? I mean—it monitors the sensors’ signals,
right?”
“Correct,” I said, “But
didn’t you say that the problem is intermittent?”
“Yeah—we even tried
training the sensors in a different order and it worked fine.”
I jotted that down.
“It acts up for the customer, right? But it doesn’t act up in your shop?”
“That’s right.”
“Is the customer
driving the vehicle with an insurance tracking device, or a cell phone charger,
power inverter—anything like that?”
“I don’t know—the guy
is in the waiting room, so I’ll ask him.”
That is a missed
step in the diagnostic process. Always check for aftermarket devices in the
vehicle and always ask the customer about using them, also. Rod came back to
the phone.
“The guy said not
really.”
“Rod, it isn’t a
tough question—yes or no? I don’t know what not
really means in this business.”
“He uses a cell
phone charger. But he also said he charges the phone while driving and
sometimes the tire pressure system acts up with the charger plugged in and
sometimes it doesn’t.”
“Most cell phone chargers don’t produce high levels of RFI all the time, Rod. It depends on the state of charge of the cell phone
battery. The phone must be almost completely discharged in some cases for lots
of RFI to be produced."
I heard Rod explain what I just said to the customer but Mr. Customer
wasn’t buying it.”
“Rod, ask the guy if the charger is the original charger that came with
his phone.”
After a couple of minutes the guy said that he couldn’t find the
original charger and bought a cheap one.
“Here’s the problem,” I started, “Cheap chargers don’t carry CE, MFI and
RHOS approvals. The U.S. market TPMS transmits data on 315MHz,
while the European TPMS transmits data on 434MHz. Electronic devices not
intended for U.S. markets may not be shielded properly for different
frequencies, thus interfering with U.S. market devices—understand?”
I heard Rod tell the guy as best as he could but I heard the
customer arguing. Rod came back to the phone.
“Is there anything else we can check? He doesn’t believe the charger
could be doing it.”
“Yeah, Rod—you can
disconnect the dealer-installed alarm system and tell the guy to drive the
Focus for a while to see what happens. Sometimes, the interference can be caused by a module or ground on the vehicle.
Depending on how bad the issue is, a dirty ground, improperly built ground
shield or module can disable the system. Modules that have microcontrollers
using clock circuits to create the timing pulses for the microprocessor may
radiate RFI. I can go on, but how much does the guy want to pay you to diagnose
it, Rod?”
Rod chatted with the customer. The guy decided to leave his car for
additional diagnostic time. Rod set him up with a rental car and he left.
“Thanks for your time,” Rod said to me, “I’ll let you know what we find.”
And here the story may have ended except that one week later, that
argumentative customer brought the rental car back with a TPMS problem that
developed AFTER he plugged in that cheap, Brand X cell phone charger
into the rental and it triggered a fault.
And he didn’t want to pay Rod for his diagnostic time because the car
didn’t really have a problem—it was the charger.
“I don’t need customers like that,” Rod said.
“Really? Did you charge the guy to retrain the system the first time he
brought it in?”
“Well, yeah, but—“
“Did you charge him to do a cold reboot of the SJB?”
“Well, yeah, but—“
“Did you charge the guy for the four sensors you installed that the
Focus didn’t need?”
“Okay, okay—I get your point.”
I guess Rod got his training from the customer’s wallet, eh?
Closing up shop for the night.
No comments:
Post a Comment